With the DDJ-SZ in stores now, Pioneer have clearly set out to produce the ultimate all-in-one DJ controller for Serato DJ. Have they succeeded? We put it to the test in our review, watch the full piece and read more details inside.

The Good

• Incredibly feature-rich
• Professional build and sound quality
• Great jog wheels
• Just light enough to be truly portable

The Bad

• Expensive
• Won’t fit in many DJ booths
• Lack of post-fader Serato DJ effects

The Bottom Line: In many ways, the DDJ-SZ ($1999 in the DJTT webstore) is the best controller on the market. It certainly won’t be suitable for everyone, though.

INTRODUCTION

Half-close your eyes, and look at the DDJ-SZ; looks familiar, right? At a glance, the SZ could easily be mistaken for a full CDJ/DJM Nexus setup, and so comparisons must naturally be drawn between the two. The SZ is a very different animal though, and on closer inspection shares more in common with Pioneer’s previous flagship controller, the DDJ-SX.
The SX proved to be massively popular, and rightly so. I own one myself, and it still stands up as a superb controller to this day, almost 2 years after release. So to find that, in so many respects, the SZ feels like a scaled up SX, is no disappointment. The layout is very, very similar, but things like the cue/play buttons, the loop controls, and the performance pads are just a touch bigger. For fat-fingered DJs like myself, that’s a definite improvement.
One area which hasn’t been fed steroids is the pitch faders, which were already a very good size on the SX, and prove equally responsive on the SZ. Long mixes should not pose a problem on this one, although I’d still like to see a +/-6% pitch range option in Serato DJ available across all their supported hardware.

JOG WHEELS ON THE DDJ-SZ

The main reason for the increase in footprint is those full-size (in CDJ terms) conductive jog wheels, which are pretty wonderful. They feature the traditional central display found on CDJs, which allows for much more accuracy when pulling back to a cue marker; I always found the limited number of ‘segments’ on the SX display just a little bit too vague when doing that. You also get a red countdown bar to the next cue, which is handy if you’re trying to get away from staring at your laptop.
One thing which must be mentioned when discussing the jogs on the SZ, as it was pretty common knowledge in the DJ community when it first launched; there was a confirmed hardware issue with the jog wheels in the earliest batches of this controller, which sometimes caused them to be unresponsive. It was narrowed down to a particular chip, and is apparently resolved. Certainly, during the week I spent with the SZ, I was paying very close attention to see if I could reproduce the issues, and not once did I experience any problem with the jogs in any respect. They were very quick to respond to my touch, and I never lost control of the playhead at any point with Serato DJ.
The use of conductive technology in the jog wheels, as opposed to what is effectively a simple ‘switch’ in regular CDJ platters, does lead to a slightly different feel in use. It’s hard to describe; there’s just absolutely no ‘give’, as they feel completely solid, and their momentum feels different. It’s not objectively better, or worse, but if you’re expecting the platters to feel exactly the same as those on CDJs, you might be surprised.
When it comes to scratching, and overall control, the large size is a definite bonus compared to the SX and other controllers with smaller jog wheels. Spinning platters, as found on the Numark NS7 II, the natural competitor of the SZ, will certainly be the preference of many people, but it’s 2014, and I know a number of great DJs, who’ve been working for years, and have never even touched a spinning platter in their lives, having grown up using solely CDJs. So unless you’re a truly hardcore turntablist, I think the static platters of the SZ will do the job very nicely.

SERATO DJ INTEGRATION

The SZ was built from the ground up to work with Serato DJ, and it shows. The hardware and software are incredibly tightly integrated, and the performance of the two in unison is superb. It’s as much a flagship controller for Serato as it is for Pioneer.
All of Serato DJ’s best features are represented here, with the performance pads being a particular upgrade from the SX, as they are now multicoloured, which means not only is it much easier to discern which mode they are in at a glance, but also offering the ability to set your own custom colours for cue points, which can be used to differentiate different types of cues (intro, drop, outro etc).
The loop roll, slicer, and SP6 modes all work as expected, and it’s good to see the cue loop functionality from the DDJ-SP1 appear here, which allows you to activate a loop at the same time as hitting a cue. It offers some interesting creative possibilities.
My only disappointment with the pad section is that, as seems to be standard with SDJ now, the auto beat loops are relegated solely to their own section of the controller. Most of the older Serato controllers, like my Vestax VCI-380 and Novation Twitch, which were designed for Itch, tended to have pads assigned to each loop length, which made it very easy to loop a particular number of beats without thinking too hard. Because SDJ’s looping and loop rolls are tied together, it’s easy to do a loop roll flourish, then accidentally hit a very short autoloop with the loop controls on the SZ, throwing your mix off. That has caught me out many times with the SX.
The pads have a different, stiffer feel than those on the NS7 II, but are very responsive and nice to use. Overall, the pad section is a very comprehensive highlight of the SZ.

ALL THE INS AND OUTS

Anyone who has hooked up a DDJ-SX to software other than Serato DJ might have been surprised to find that the interface in it only features a limited 2 in/out soundcard; whilst that isn’t a disaster in many respects, it does mean that DVS control with an SX will never happen with it.
Not so with the SZ. The units includes not one, but two, soundcards, each with inputs and outputs for 4 decks, plus a dedicated channel for recording your mix. What that means in use, is not only can you hook up turntables or CD players to control any or all of the four software decks via timecode, but you can also connect two computers to the SZ simultaneously, switching seamlessly between them at will.
It’s the first time we’ve seen such a feature in a controller, although it’s been a feature of Rane’s Serato products for a while now. And in practice, it works superbly. It’s not quite as flexible as Rane’s solution, as you can only swap either the entire left or right side of the controller in one go, whereas on the Rane 64, for example, you can assign each channel to each computer on an individual basis. But it makes switching between different DJs a breeze, and back-to-back sets a very simple proposition.

The DVS setup works perfectly, and in use, it feels no different from my regular Serato DJ setup for DVS, with a Rane SL3 box, apart from there being a massive controller sat between the turntables instead of a regular 12” mixer.
One word on the recording function – I was happy to find that setting the interface (in Pioneer’s setting utility) to record the whole mix, really did mean just that. Audio from both computers, the mic input, external sources, ALL gets recorded, on either computer. That’s a real bonus compared to the limited recording capabilities of many SDJ controllers.
Using the mixer section without software, standalone, proves to be pretty cool too. Personally, I’d have liked phono level inputs on all the channels, as opposed to just the two on the outside, but that’s personal taste.

CAUSE AND FX

There are 3 FX sections on the SZ in total. Firstly, there is the standard arrangement of 4 knobs at the top of the controller on each side for SDJ’s Izotope FX. They work as well as always, although I was sad to discover they are pre-fader only, which is unusual for an SDJ controller. My guess is that the reason for that is related to the arrangement of the soundcards for DVS, but is still a disappointment, as I’m very into post-fader echoes and delays, etc.
Thankfully, the new Colour FX section goes some way to make up for that, featuring as it does, and post-fader echo of it’s own. As with all of Pioneer’s colour FX, these are simple, one-knob controlled FX, with the echo, jet (a kind of phaser), filter, and pitch effects all doing the job with the minimum of fuss. As each channel has it’s own colour FX control, there’s no way to have the echo tail continue after cutting with the crossfader, only the upfader, but I can live with that.
The third FX section contains the oscillator FX. These are sounds generated by the hardware, and were the subject of some derision when first announced, containing, as it does, an ‘instant air horn’ option. At it’s best, this section makes some interesting noises, but you’ll probably tire of them pretty quickly, and at it’s worst, it sounds like one of those battery-powered keyrings you could buy in the 1980s, with a police siren, machine gun noise, etc.
Between the Izotope FX, and the Colour FX, though, there should be enough else here to keep the most FX-heavy DJs happy. It’s also nice that the colour FX can also be applied to the master, SP6, and external inputs on each channel, as well as the microphone section too. Speaking of which…

DDJ-SX REDUX

As cool as it was, the DDJ-SX was not without a few issues of its own. The microphone input, for one, was limited in that to use it, you had to sacrifice a mixer channel, losing a deck. There were also many reports of users finding the gain stage of the mic pre-amp to be far too low. On the SZ, you’ve got two separate mic inputs, each with it’s own level control, and EQ for both. Much more flexible. I also tried the inputs with 3 different mics, and found the preamps to be absolutely fine. So I think Pioneer have got that nailed with the SZ.
Another issue some users had with the SX was the fact that the touchstrips, used to scrub through tracks, could potentially be activated by mistake when trying to use the FX controls situated directly above them. Now, personally, I’ve never had that problem myself, in all the gigs I’ve done with my SX, but it was clearly an annoyance for many. So it’s good to see that the touchstrip can now be locked during playback, meaning you have to stop the deck to use it. (That can be toggled on or off in the controller’s onboard setup menu).

The crossfader in the SX was decidedly unspectacular; nothing wrong with it as such, but a really basic fader, which didn’t take a ton of abuse. Whilst that can now be replaced with a Mini Innofader, the SZ avoids the need for that by including Pioneer’s Magvel fader; a super smooth magnetic, long-life unit, with tension adjust. It’s great.
Pioneer have definitely responded to user feedback from their previous controllers, and deserve praise for that.

SOUND AND BUILD QUALITY

The aforementioned audio interfaces in the SZ sound absolutely superb. Easily up there with the ones found in Pioneer’s DJM series of mixers. When combined with the plethora of physical ins and outs of the hardware, you’ve got a controller which will happily sit in the most demanding of audio environments.
What’s remarkable about the SZ is not how solid it feels (very), but in how comparatively light it feels considering how large it is. Weighing in at around 23lbs, that’s over 10lbs lighter than the NS7 II, which feels every ounce of it’s 34lb heft. Unlike the Numark, I could genuinely see myself carrying the SZ around on a regular basis, more so if I found a suitably well padded bag for it (and if Decksaver get round to bringing out a model to fit), rather than thinking I’d absolutely need a flightcase, as with the NS7 II.
Like the SX, the SZ features a full metal faceplate, but I was pleased to see that it is now separated into three sections. Like some other users, I’ve found the all-in-one plate on my SX has warped slightly over time, so having separate pieces should serve to prevent that on the SZ, and make replacements easier in case of damage.

CROSSING THE STREAMS: DDJ-SZ WITH TRAKTOR

Despite being such a Serato DJ-focused device, the SZ is still compatible with other software… Up to a point.
During the review period I tried the SZ with Traktor 2.6.8, using Artwork’s mapping, as found HERE>>. It’s a fun mapping with instant gratification effects and stuff all built in, and overall, it performed well. Traktor can address all the inputs and outputs fine (although it is not Scratch certified, of course).
Then, the night before my review unit was due to go back, Pioneer also released their own Traktor mapping, complete with a firmware update to match, and so I got a chance to try that for a couple of hours too.
It is certainly a slightly bizarre experience having two laptops connected to a single controller, one using Traktor and one using SDJ, but amazingly, it works! The USB switching is just as smooth as with a pair of computers running SDJ. Impressive.
What’s less impressive, is the jog wheel performance in Traktor. Now, there’s nobody to blame for that except Native Instruments, Pioneer aren’t at fault there. Unless NI stop being so insular, and start working with third-party manufacturers properly, that’s going to be the case for all non-NI hardware. Midi platter control will simply never be as good as proper native support, and the SZ is a clear demonstration of that. The lovely tight control found with SDJ is completely lacking in Traktor, with cue points slipping, and a general feeling of ‘wonkiness’.
For some people, jog wheel performance is not really an issue, but I can’t in good conscience recommend that anyone spend $2000 on this controller just to use with Traktor. If jog wheels really don’t matter to you, that’s fine, but then I must question the logic of buying something where so much thought (and your money) has gone into offering such great platters in the first place.

WHO IS THE DDJ-SZ FOR?

This is the big question with the SZ. I massively enjoyed spending time with it; and if it suits your style, and wallet, there’s so much fun to be had with such a comprehensive, and unique, feature set.
The large size is a part of that – it really feels and performs like professional kit, and you’ll certainly look like a ‘pro’ when standing behind it at a gig. But what kind of gig? I have had enough struggles fitting my SX into many of the bar & club booths I play in, and the extra width of the SZ would make it a total non-starter for those. For DJs like me, who usually have to work with or around existing installed equipment, something smaller makes a lot more sense.
One segment of the market which I’m sure will jump at the SZ is mobile DJs, and rightly so. The huge amount of input options, mixer channels, and good mic section mean that it’s ideal for a mobile jock who wants ‘the full package’ whilst not carrying round too much heavy kit. The SZ is certainly very portable considering it’s size.
I’ve heard it suggested that the two USB ports makes the SZ ideal for bar and small club installs. I don’t believe that’s a smart choice, frankly – for the SZ to be truly ‘plug and play’ for any DJ, they’ll need to be a user of the current version of Serato DJ, and that’s simply not a massive proportion of DJs in the world. There’s still a large number of Scratch Live users who have yet to migrate, before we even count the USB, CD, Traktor, VirtualDJ, and MixVibes users. Sure, you can plug extra sources into the SZ, but if the controller aspect isn’t going to be used all the time, a venue owner can save a lot of cash by just buying a regular mixer. Even if a venue doesn’t want to splash out on a full Nexus rig, they’ll still be better off with a pair of CDJ-850s and a basic mixer. That setup will adapt far more readily to different requirements, and be easier to fix when something gets broken, due to it’s modular nature.
The way I see it, the SZ is perfect for somebody who’s already in the Serato ecosystem – perhaps they use a Rane interface and CDJs at venues they play. The kind of person who can’t justify spending the massive expense on a pair of CDJs just to use in HID mode when mixing at home. For that kind of use, the SZ, even at $2000, seems like a bit of a steal. As a Serato DJ user, you’ll be getting the maximum functionality for your software of choice, and you’ll be getting some very inspiring hardware to get your creative juices flowing.

FL Studio is a pattern based sequencer. This is somewhat different than the more "normal" sequencers in that they are more arranger-centric. While being pattern based is different, it is also very easy to understand and can lead to highly creative results.
The basic interface and workflow relies upon 3 main areas that work together. The Pattern, The Playlist and The Mixer
Pattern


The pattern is where you will generally create the various musicl phrases or "loops". These loops are created by placing a new channel in the pattern and assigning it to play back something. These can be drum beats, samples or instrumentation.

A pattern channel can be any type of sound source supported by FL Studio whether it's a VST instrument, a built in generator or a WAV/OGG/MP3 sample. The Pattern supports note entry in either the step sequencer or the piano roll (FL Studio Producer and XXL only).

Each channel can be further augmented by assigning it to a Mixer channel to be further processed.

Mixer

The mixer represents your typical mixing board interface. Here you will be able to control various sounds from pattern channels that have been routed to mixer channels. The main fader controls the over all volume and there is the ability to add more effects (built-in, VST, DX) to the sounds routed to each individual channel. This makes it use for routing groups of sounds together for processing. For example, you might route sounds of Cellos, Violins and Violas to a single mixer channel and apply reverb to them as a group.

Playlist


This is where it all comes together. The playlist represents a series of patterns and audio clips to be played simultanouesly and in a specific order. This is equivalent to arranging your song. You might have a Pattern with a drum loop play along with a pattern containing a recorded guitar part for example. You can add remove patterns from the timeline as neede to create a fully arranged musical composition.

Conclusion

This is a very basic explanation of FL Studio and how it works. For more specific guidance, browse the rest of the site or use the search function to find out more information.

Virtual DJ 8 - Setup with a Numark DJ Controller

Setting up a Numark DJ controller in Virtual DJ 8 may look intimidating but it’s a pretty easy task.  The guide below will walk you through on how to properly setup your Numark DJ controller in Virtual DJ 8.  This guide is universal for all Numark DJ controllers.

1. Connect your DJ controller via USB to your computer
2. Open your Virtual DJ 8 software and enter you login information if prompted. 
3. Click the SETUP button in the software.
   
   
    
4. Your controller may automatically connect to your software but you still will have to make some sound setting changes in Virtual DJ 8’s SETUP.
5. Select AUDIO. The AUDIO tab is the most important part of your setup in Virtual DJ 8. This will determine your setup. Under AUDIO SETUP, make the following changes below.
   
   
     OUTPUT: Choose SPEAKER & HEADPHONE
   CARD: Choose your NUMARK CONTROLLER
   INPUT: Do not choose anything
   Note: Numark USB controllers without a sound card built in will have different setup.  DJ's should reference their external sound cards manual for proper setup.  Also, Numark DJ's with the following controllers below should reference the following images for proper audio setup.
   

   
   Numark Mixdeck, Mixdeck Express, Mixdeck Quad
   

   
   Numark NS6
   
   
   
   Numark NS7, NS7FX, NS7II
   
    

6. Select CONTROLLERS.  Select your Numark controller.
   
   
   
7. Select AUDIO.  Then hit APPLY to save your sound settings.
   
   
   
   
8. Exit out of the Virtual DJ 8 SETUP window.
   
9. That’s it!  Enjoy your Numark controller with Virtual DJ 8.
   

Further Technical Support

Whether you are a customer or dealer, if you already own an Numark product, or if you just have pre-sales questions, the Numark technical support team is available to help!
Visit the link below to connect with any of the following support options: online community support, phone support, email support.

• www.numark.com/support

I know your eyes in the morning sun
I feel you touch me in the pouring rain
And the moment that you wander far from me
I want to feel you in my arms again
And you come to me on a summer breeze
Keep me warm in your love, then you softly leave
And it's me you need to show

How deep is your love, how deep is your love
How deep is your love?
I really mean to learn
'Cause we're living in a world of fools
Breaking us down when they all should let us be
We belong to you and me

I believe in you
You know the door to my very soul
You're the light in my deepest, darkest hour
You're my savior when I fall
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do
And it's me you need to show

How deep is your love, how deep is your love
How deep is your love?
I really mean to learn
'Cause we're living in a world of fools
Breaking us down when they all should let us be
We belong to you and me

And you come to me on a summer breeze
Keep me warm in your love, then you softly leave
And it's me you need to show

How deep is your love, how deep is your love
How deep is your love?
I really mean to learn
'Cause we're living in a world of fools
Breaking us down when they all should let us be
We belong to you and me

How deep is your love, how deep is your love
I really mean to learn
'Cause we're living in a world of fools
Breaking us down when they all should let us be
We belong to you and me

How deep is your love, how deep is your love
I really mean to learn
'Cause we're living in a world of fools
Breaking us down when they all should let us be
We belong to you and me

Pengertian search engine, cara kerja, dan manfaatnya. Bagaimana search engine menurut para ahli? wikipedia? sebagai contoh search engine Google, bagaimana cara kerjanya? Jadi, dalam tulisan ini saya akan mempelajari hal-hal berikut:

• Pengertian Search Engine: Apa yang di Maksud dengan Search Engine?
• Manfaat Search Engine: Apa search engine memiliki manfaat?
• Cara Kerja Search Engine: Bagaimana cara kerja searh engine mulai dari perayapan, indexing, dan penyajian hasil search engine?

Kita mulai dengan bahasan pertama,
Pengertian Search Engine
Kita simak pengertian search engine menurut wikipedia bahasa inggris. Search engine atau di-Indonesia-kan menjadi mesin pencari adalah sebuah sistem perangkat lunak (software) yang di desain untuk melakukan pencarian data atau informasi di world wide web (www). Hasil pencarian akan menampilkan serangkaian informasi yang bersumber dari website/blog tertentu, hasil pencarian ini sering disebut Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs).  Selain halaman website, informasi yang ditampilkan bisa berupa gambar, video, atau tipe file lainnya. Search engine melakukan pendataan secara real time dengan bersandar pada algoritma yang sudah teratur dalam web crawl. Inilah yang membedakannya dengan web directories (direktori web) yang biasanya melakukan pendataan manual oleh manusia (human editors).
Manfaat Search Engine
Setelah memahami pengertian search engine, kita perlu mengetahui apa sih manfaat search engine? Seluruh pengguna internet pasti pernah menggunakan search engine. Barangkali semua akan setuju bahwa hasil teknologi canggih yang satu ini sangat bermanfaat, terutama dalam hal melakukan pencarian data atau informasi yang kita butuhkan. Kita hanya perlu mengetikan kata kunci tertentu pada kolom pencarian yang disediakan, dan mesin pencari akan bekerja dan menyajikan sumber yang relevan dengan kata kunci tersebut. Dan itu hanya membutuhkan waktu sekian detik. Tidak bisa dibayangkan jika teknologi ini tidak ada. Bagaimana caranya kita menemukan informasi yang relevan diantara jutaan sumber yang tersedia? Search engine ini berfungsi layaknya index buku yang biasanya berada di halaman belakang. Ia menunjukkan lokasi kata atau istilah diantara jutaan kata lainnya dalam buku tersebut.  Terima kasih search engine!
Cara Kerja Search engine
Lalu bagaimana cara kerja search engine sehingga ia bisa bekerja dengan sangat cepat dalam menemukan lokasi kata kunci tertentu diantara jutaan halaman yang ada di internet? Beranjak dari fakta bahwa search engine terpopuler saat ini adalah google, saya memutuskan untuk mempelajari cara kerja raksasa mesin pencari tersebut daripada harus mempelajari berbagai macam search engine yang ada. Sumber paling tepat untuk mendapatkan informasi tersebut tentunya halaman bantuan google sendiri. Berikut ini informasi yang saya temukan dari halaman bantuan google. Sebuah video yang menunjukkan bagaimana mesin pencari google bekerja. Video ini dibawakan oleh Matt Cutts yang saat ini merupakan kepala tim webspam google. Teman-teman bisa juga mengunjungi halaman tersebut secara langsung di sini.
Berdasarkan penjelasan dari sumber tersebut, google memiliki perangkat lunak atau software bernama Web Crawlers. Seperti pada bahasan pengertian search engine yang menjelaskan bahwa search engine adalah sebuah sistem software. Sesuai dengan namanya, software ini bekerja untuk menemukan halaman web yang tersedia untuk umum. Perlu diketahui bahwa tidak semua halaman website bisa ditemukan. Hal ini menyangkut pengaturan webmaster sendiri, apakah halaman web tersebut mau dipublikasikan atau tidak. Terkadang webmaster menginginkan halamannya tersembunyi dengan suatu alasan sehingga itu akan mencegah web crawlers menemukannya. Web Crawlers google ini dikenal juga dengan nama “Googlebot”. Seperti layaknya kita melakukan browsing pada sebuah website atau blog, robot ini memperhatikan halaman tersebut dan juga mengikuti setiap link yang ada di sana untuk kemudian dibawa kembali ke server google.

Aplikasi browser dapat diunduh secara gratis. Dan saya pribadi belum pernah mendengar ada aplikasi browser yang berbayar. Dan dari tahun ke tahun selalu terjadi perang dan persaingan antar browser, yang tersengit adalah antara Mozilla Firefox dan Internet Explorer. Akan tetapi di tahun 2014 ini tidak hanya kedua aplikasi browser tersebut yang bersaing secara sengit, ada beberapa browser yang bisa dikatakan masih baru namun telah menunjukkan eksistensinya di dunia internet. Berikut ini merupakan 5 Browser terbaik tahun 2014 i.
1. Google Chrome
2. Mozilla Firefox
3. Internet Explorer
4. Opera
5. Safari

1. Google Chrome Google telah mengembangkan dan telah membuat kode chrome dari kode sumber Chromium yang bersifat open source. Google Chrome sangat sederhana, sangat bersih, sangat mudah digunakan dan juga elegan. Apalagi Chrome terintegrasi dengan semua layanan Google seperti Gmail, Drive, Google Maps, dll. Google Chrome menggunakan versi terbaru dari perangkat lunak dan teknologi internet untuk menghasilkan kecepatan browsing web tercepat bagi para penggunanya. Akan tetapi kecepatan itu telah membuat Chrome terlalu banyak memberatkan kinerja PC. Anda dapat men-download secara gratis dan melakukan update secara otomatis setiap kali ada versi yang lebih baru. Terdapat toko chrome (chrome Store), di mana Anda dapat menemukan ribuan aplikasi dan ekstensi yang siap pakai untuk meningkatkan fungsionalitas dari Google Chrome. Dalam satu kata, tidak ada kompetitor untuk browser ini.


2. Mozilla Firefox Mozilla Firefox merupakan browser yang dapat dibilang sangat baik. Browser yang satu ini selalu mengikuti perkembangan aplikasi web. Apalagi dengan Tersedianya ribuan plugin dan addon membuat Firefox menjadi salah satu browser yang dapat diandalkan untuk kegiatan browsing anda.










 3. Internet Explorer Internet Explorer adalah browser bawaan dari sistem operasi windows. Meskipun browser ini sangat populer, namun ada kekurangan yaitu sisi keamanan yang masih menjadi masalah dari browser ini. Dukungan terhadap teknologi web juga belum begitu bagus. Bisa dibilang Internet Eksplorer selalu terlambat dalam melakukan pembaruan.


 4. Opera Browser Opera menjadi pilihan berikutnya. Kinerjanya cukup baik, akan tetapi untuk memuat sebuah halaman web, opera memang lebih lambat jika dibandaingkan dengan google chrome atau mozilla firefox. bahkan kepopuleran Opera untuk versi PC kalah jauh bila dibandingkan untuk versi opera mobile sendiri.








5. Safari Safari merupakan browser default pada produk apple. Akan tetapi Safari juga telah tersedia untuk versi windows. Dengan tampilan ala mac OS, safari menjadi salah satu browser yang elegan.

If you're not yet a 'Running Man' enthusiast, certainly you've at least heard of, or know of the hype surrounding this wildly successful variety program. Since it first aired back in 2010, SBS's 'Running Man' has been doing exceptionally well with regards to attracting and upholding the audience interest.

More so than that, the program's domestic and international fan base hasn't stopped multiplying; the program transcends any age barriers, seeing as to how elementary school kids find the show just as hilarious as do elders; and perhaps most tellingly, viewers consistently finish watching the episode feeling good. It's not so much a matter of one episode being bad as it is a matter of other episodes being better.
  

ADVERTISEMENT

But what is it about this particular program that makes it so remarkable? Though there are plenty of variety programs out there, - both of the past and present - 'Running Man' has become indispensable to the genre of lighthearted, semi-scripted entertainment. Why, though?

C        G/B     Am                    F       G             C
I read a note my grandma wrote back in nineteen twenty-three.
C       G/B     Am                  Dm7               Gsus  G
Grandpa kept it in his coat, and he showed it once to me.     He said,
C         G/B       Am                F          G      C
"Boy, you might not understand, but a long, long time ago,
C         G/B          Am      F           G                  C  F/C  C
Grandma's daddy didn't like me none, but I loved your Grandma so."


C           G/B   Am           F       G       C
We had this crazy plan to meet and run away together.
C           G/B    Am                 Dm7          Gsus    G
Get married in the first town we came to, and live forever.
C          G/B    Am                 F           G         C
But nailed to the tree where we were supposed to meet, instead
C         G/B        Am           F       G       C  F/C  C
Of her, I found this letter, and this is what it said:

       F            G     C   F          G     C
If you get there before I do, don't give up on me.
     F                G          Am
I'll meet you when my chores are through;
Dm7             Dm7/C      Gsus  G
I don't know how long I'll be.
        F         G       C     F       G        Am
But I'm not gonna let you down, darling wait and see.
       F            G            E7        Am7
And between now and then, till I see you again,
        F       G       C   G/B  | Am  Am/G  | Dm  G  | C F/C C
I'll be loving you.  Love, me.

C            G/B        Am              F       G        C
I read those words just hours before my Grandma passed away,
C              G/B  Am                  Dm7                Gsus  G
In the doorway of a church where me and Grandpa stopped to pray.
C          G/B   Am              F      G       C
I know I'd never seen him cry in all my fifteen years;
C         G/B        Am       F        G                   C  F/C  C
But as he said these words to her, his eyes filled up with tears.


       F            G     C   F          G     C
If you get there before I do, don't give up on me.
     F                G          Am
I'll meet you when my chores are through;
Dm7             Dm7/C      Gsus  G
I don't know how long I'll be.
        F         G       C     F       G        Am
But I'm not gonna let you down, darling wait and see.
       F            G            E7        Am7
And between now and then, till I see you again,
        F       G       C    Am7
I'll be loving you.  Love, me.
   F            G            E7        Am7
Between now and then, till I see you again,
        F       G (NO CHORDS)
I'll be loving you.  Love, me.